I'll take a look. On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Roland Turner < roland.tur...@trustsphere.com> wrote:
> John Payne wrote: > > >> Presumably this just indicates that the rewrite rule that Brandon > described for Google Groups > >> is not in use by IETF's mailing lists? > >> > >> Tradeoffs in every direction... > > > > I wasn't expecting behavior changes for ietf mail. > > > > To clarify, with p=none I had no complaints. With p=quarantine, pct=0 I > have complaints from gmail users. > > > > I believe this points to gmail perhaps not looking at the pct... > > Apologies, wrote before thinking it through. What should have happened is > that the failures identified in aggregate reports should have gone down as > Google Groups would rewrite because of it, but that no changes in receiver > behaviour should occur. > > I agree, this looks like a Gmail bug. > > Brandon, are you able to explore this with your colleagues? > > - Roland
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
