Hector Santos writes: > Are you oppose to any other domain using strong policies or just > certain ones?
Domains where users have until now felt free to use their mailboxes as they see fit (posting to mailing lists, as From: in on-behalf-of services, etc) should not suddenly impose "p=reject" IMO. > You didn't answer the question in another post regarding if you are > even ready or support the idea of even doing a DNS lookup to find > out what a domain's policy is? I have stated several times that I have no quarrel with DMARC as is, that I think it is a good protocol overall, and that in particular "p=reject" is useful in "transactional" contexts. It is a logical consequence that I support the idea of a lookup to discover policy. > It is more easier, more feasible, more safe, to just reject/discard > the failed message (due to policy) at the backend and be done with it. In your opinion. In my experience, many postmasters resist that policy. > Do you realize how many different MUAs exist? and the different forms > of MUAs? I haven't counted. How many are there? > Why pass the buck to the user when the backend can deal with this > and its works for all MUAs!! Because the backend can't deal with it, except by imposing draconian policies that I know many sysadmins really want to avoid. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
