apps-discuss isn't interested in demarc procedural issues, I suppose. Hector Santos writes:
> IMO, your proposal is on par with the engineering considerations > needed to develop and mold the charter. Maybe, that's for Barry to decide, I believe. My opinion is that this part of the discussion has gone far past the development of the charter. I think a suggestion to add proposals "to maintain a history of body changes" in the message to the list in the proposed charter would be in order, of course. I suppose that's your intent, expressed verbosely? > If your offline moderation control messenger intent *My* intent (perhaps he received other advice about topicality) was to provide information about mailing list needs, not to discourage him from anything. I think he will tell you that my message was actually on the whole mildly encouraging. That was my intent, anyway. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
