>Not mentioned anywhere: Which SPF modes are considered to be a "pass" >> for purposes of DMARC? Presumably +, presumably not -, but it should say >> something about ? and ~ if it doesn't already. > >Not only is that another late-stage technical issue to punt to the working >group, but I also claim that's a layering violation.
RFC 7208 is quite clear about what constitutes an SPF pass. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
