----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Jack Assels" <mjass...@encs.concordia.ca> > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:06:12 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] questions on the spec, was ... and two more tiny > nits, while I'm at it > > What seems like ages ago, on Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:27:40 PST, > "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > http://www.blackops.org/~msk/dmarc/diff.html > > That sound to me like a call for thumbs up or thumbs down. I'd > personally like to change the infelicitous word "contradiction" > to "contrast", but rather than argue about changes, I think any > remaining argument should be simply about making the change as > proposed by Murray or not making any change at all. I've paid > attention to all the points raised, and I still think -13 is > better than -12. I don't think the floor is open for -14. > Yes "contrast" would make me more happy. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
