On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your question is "Are they equivalent?" I believe they are. Although it > might be ideal to have a specification so tight that there's exactly one > way to do something, in the end I don't think it's harmful to have two ways > to say the same thing. It's more of a concern if there's to ways to > interpret a single thing; that's when we arguably have something to fix. > Sigh. s/to ways/two ways/ -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
