> Based upon the almost complete lack of interest of
> bulk email providers at promoting a solution, it seems the path
> forward is to define a new non-aligned header field able to retain the 
> author role information, otherwise the From is likely overwritten as 
> the only practical means of ensuring message acceptance in the face of 
> provider DMARC (ab)use.

If bulk email providers have shown no interest in promoting a solution, why do 
we think they'd latch onto this new non-aligned header field as a solution?

-- Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 3:41 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Next steps for RFC 7489 (DMARC)

Dear DMARC WG,

Now that RFC7489 has been published, there remains several 
unresolved problems this WG is charted to resolve, primarily--
1. Addressing the issues with indirect mail flows

These are reviewed by
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dmarc-interoperability-00

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dmarc-author-align-01
was written to highlight possible solutions.

John Levine's recommendation that mailing-list operators take on 
the costly burden of having their participants change their providers 
is not practical.  Based upon the almost complete lack of interest of
bulk email providers at promoting a solution, it seems the path
forward is to define a new non-aligned header field able to retain the 
author role information, otherwise the From is likely overwritten as 
the only practical means of ensuring message acceptance in the face of 
provider DMARC (ab)use.

By defining a new header field, this should reduce disparity in where to 
find the author role than that caused by current ad hoc solutions.  Such 
a definition would also better avoid downgrading 'reject' into 
'quarantine'.

Any thoughts?

Regards,
Douglas Otis






_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to