On Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:31 PM [GMT+1=CET], John Levine wrote: > > > How big is the volume of DMARC-problematic indirect email flows, > > > compared to the general volume of email which can readily benefit > > > from DMARC? > > The numbers I've seen say that the volume of mail that DMARC screws up > is fairly low, but it is very high value. > > Personally, I would be happy never to get any more mail from my bank, > if it meant that my mailing lists would work again.
But do you think the general email-using population will be happy to miss authentic email from eBay, Amazon, Paypal and American Airlines, just to get email from some mailing list(s) delivered to their inbox? Also, your mailing list would work again in a heartbeat, in a DMARC-world, if you just configured them to put the original Header-From into the "description" of a new Header-From, like: From: "Pedro Antunez" <pe...@example.com> ==> From: "Pedro Antunez pe...@example.com" <l...@domain.com> It's about time that MLM software that modifies the in-flight message, rendering its DKIM signature invalid, takes ownership as Author of the new modified message they are resending. Regards, J.Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
