Assuming the schemes in those drafts worked, both cases have a valid list-whatever signature AND a valid author signature, AND you know the (a) or (b) added bit is solely the responsibility of the list (and, conversely, you also know where the original content starts and ends). Nobody's saying it's safe in any case, but you do know who did what, and that's more than we know today.
Indeed, but I don't see why it's useful. If you're going to run stuff through content filters anyway, what's the point? This sounds like it's going to reduce to mostly whitelisting well behaved remailers, which is an approach we know large systems aren't likely to use.
Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
