On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Michael Jack Assels < mjass...@encs.concordia.ca> wrote:
> Right. I'd been avoiding that because I saw this as a relatively minor > change to Murray's draft-kucherawy-dkim-transform-00, but if message > wrapping is considered a nonstarter, a new I-D is in order, assuming that > there's a simple, secure, and palatable way to divide any arbitrary message > body into its "original Author part" and "list decoration part(s)", > irrespective of the Author's part being good-ol' text or MIME. Since we're just throwing out ideas, I don't mind adding your "stf" idea to the transform draft. Just send me some text. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
