----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Levine" <jo...@taugh.com> > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Cc: fra...@peachymango.org > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:16:26 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt > > >Please submit "stuff" that needs to be fixed > > The worst problem is still section 3.1.2.3 which needs to be deleted, > since most of what it says is wrong, and what little isn't wrong is > irrelevant. >
I rewrote some of it, see next email... I'm mulling indeed about deleting the whole EAI stuff, because it is about tangent policies around DMARC and not an interoperability issue per se. But I'm stubborn, so I leave it for one last round, if only to get someone(you) to comment on the draft :P Pass that, I don't see much more comments, so WG Chair should move the document close to last call? I see the mailing list is focused on finding future solutions, not in explaining current operational solutions. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
