----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hector Santos" <hsan...@isdg.net> > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:06:32 AM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt > > On 5/23/2015 10:59 AM, ned+dm...@mrochek.com wrote: > > (chair hat off) > > > > For DMARC, I don't support any form of rewriting the header from. I > don't think the interop report should encourage rewriting or > downgrading. But I am not sure if removal/deleting the section does > that. I think it should say that downgrading or rewriting can cause > more unrelated to DMARC conflicts.
The EAI section is removed, because it is about rejecting message that may trivially bypass DMARC, rather than the scope of the document which is what to do to remediate DMARC policy. > > The reports should outline all the related issues that a current and > future MARC implementation may run into. > Future is hard to predict _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
