Yes, it is too much. I could care less how DMARC works, in the sense that it clearly _doesn't_ work. Knowing how it works is not my problem, and is not the secretariat's problem. Making IETF mailing lists work is the secretariat's problem (not mine anymore). Belittling people who are arguing that a long-standing problem needs to be fixed is not appropriate.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:34 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > In article > <CAPt1N1=xuj7E66V=ijo8ire1odjbn3h7sao3modow4s0jjy...@mail.gmail.com> you > write: >>FWIW, I use Google For Work (or whatever it's called this week) and it >>doesn't automatically add DMARC headers-- > > Is it too much to ask that anyone who wants to tell us how to deal > with DMARC should at least read RFC 7489 so he knows how DMARC works? > > R's, > John > > Helpful tip: There's no such thing as a DMARC header. > _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
