On Nov 4, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Terry Zink <tz...@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote: > And if there were something like this in other headers that retains the > original senders: > > Reply-To: originalsen...@example.com <mailto:originalsen...@example.com> > Sender: dmarc <dmarc-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org>> >
I don’t think this is quite right—I think the Reply-To needs to include all of the senders or else every reply will be an off-list reply (would cut down on noise, admittedly). Otherwise this would be a great solution. But because of the way it interacts with MUAs, I do not think it would work in a way that doesn’t violate the principle of least surprise.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
