On 11/14/2016 10:13 PM, John R Levine wrote:
On 11/14/2016 10:00 PM, John R Levine wrote:
My version puts the recipient addresses into the DKIM-Signature header
Privacy violation.
You might want to read the rest of the message before responding.
No, I didn't want to. But I did anyhow.
The proposal creates redundant information and an especially awkward
usage restriction.
Invoking the privacy concern is meant to move the focus back to the
reason the full, original rfc5321 envelope is not (necessarily) the same
as the (aggregate) rfc5322 address header field contents.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
