On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> We've had an updated draft for more than three weeks now, with no > comments. > Most of the work has been proceeding off-list with work toward an interop (that failed to happen on 12/16), ongoing development on the OpenARC package, release of the beta on MailerQ, installations for production usage at AOL and GMail. The ARC-enabled dkimpy package is available though Scott has expressed a desire to refactor some of the code. As far as we are aware, there are an number of other implementations which are waiting on a functional OpenARC package. As to open work on the spec: 1) Murray had promised some ideas for restructuring the draft to make it more understandable, but I haven't received them yet. 2) There have been some questions begging additional clarity on the relationship between the Authentication-Results header and the ARC-Authentication-Results headers which I have not yet put into prose. As to other work: There are also two sessions planned for the agenda at M3AAWG (Feb 20-23 in San Francisco) (I realize that is not an open venue, but, so far, the active participants on the spec and implementations are in both groups). We should have updates regarding implementation status after those meetings. I plan to say that this working group is NOT going to meet in Chicago. > That seems reasonable. I don't know of anything that needs F2F time right now. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
