On 01/20/2017 11:23, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm not on the ARC list, so I'll pile on this thread here...
This is the right place for anything constructive regarding the specification, so no problem regarding any other lists. > I understand the minimum key size in the draft is 512 bits. I'm not planning > on releasing any software that supports key sizes less than 1024, so I > guarantee you interoperability problems for small keys. +1 -- no need for weak keys. 1) Do we have a normative reference within the RFC framework for key lengths for different crypto systems, and can we simply invoke that reference rather than including a hard figure in this spec? 2) Does such a reference still consider 1k keys as acceptable at this time? Is there a schedule for periodic review? --S. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
