On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> > In theory, sure. In practice it's just a variation on waiting for someone > else to do the work. Additionally, DKIM will have an added burden of > gaining community consensus that the security benefits of the change are > important enough to break backward compatibility over. > > Actually that didn't come up on the ietf-dkim thread Peter referenced at all. I don't imagine that by itself would be an issue. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
