>Maybe we can build timelines into the updates. By Jan 1, 2019, receivers >SHOULD (MUST?) no longer support the >following key sizes or algorithms. That way, if anyone complains that a >particular DKIM-signature is not >considered valid, we can always say it’s RFC non-compliant.
The IETF historically hasn't done that. Would would make a difference is if some of the big gorillas (you know who you are) said you'll stop accepting weak signatures as of some date, then actually do it. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
