If you look at RFC 7960, ARC is intended mostly for the mediators case, though it would also be for the MDA/MTA case. It does nothing for the MSA case, though there have been some proposals about having a hop=0 or just falsifying hop=1 for that.
Most of the MSA issues, though, are mostly of the type "well, dmarc p=reject/quarantine means the domain holder doesn't want you doing that", so I'm not clear there's a solution there. Brandon On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:47 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> >> wrote: >> >>> We also need to understand whether there's really anything we intend >>> to do with DMARC. Do we *know* what we might do? Do we have any plan >>> for a way forward? Are we hoping that ARC will fix enough of it that >>> we can make the combination into a standard? >>> >> >> I've been proceeding under the assumption that the last sentence is the >> plan. Am I the only one? Is something else the plan? >> >> -MSK >> > > While the exact method and details of accomplishing said "combination" are > TBD, that is the general idea. > > --Kurt > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
