I also support ARC-16 (or the version that comes out of WGLC) for
experimental. I’ve been trying to follow the discussion, but the core
part of the draft seems ready to go.
Scott
On 24 Jul 2018, at 18:55, Bron Gondwana wrote:
This isn't a detailed review, because I haven't had time to do it, but
I've been following the process and I'm happy that ARC-16 is ready as
an
experimental standard.
I'm also happy with Dave's suggested improvements to the descriptive
text. My general belief is that descriptive text is important, but
test
cases are importanter, when it comes to getting good quality
implementations! Having implementations out there which have been
tested against each other is part of getting interoperability, and the
hackathons have been good for this, but having an experimental
standard
to encourage more deployment so we can collect data on real mail flows
is important too.
Cheers,
Bron.
--
Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
br...@fastmailteam.com
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdmarc&data=02%7C01%7Cscott.rose%40nist.gov%7C7978fd9fc4034aa9917c08d5f1b8a427%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636680697691762866&sdata=Gq08sjYS1lSmsBYyASt%2FiCrgufQbAMAORAAqqYS15ME%3D&reserved=0
===================================
Scott Rose
NIST ITL
scott.r...@nist.gov
+1-301-975-8439
GV: +1-571-249-3671
===================================
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
