It's been quite a while since my last full read-through of the spec, so
apologies if I blunder into anything long-settled. And apologies if I'm
repeating something from earlier commentary, I'm trying to get in under
a very liberal interpretation of the deadline as is... ;)
Love the way Section 2 introduces and describes the basics.
Section 3.1 - I would suggest "the three header fields /from a
particular Internet Mail Handler/ compose a single ARC Set." (Addition
in /slashes/.) Best to be explicit that ARC sets are organized by
(outdated term) ARC Intermediary. Or "Sealer," but that would be a
forward reference... But without this, the reader might be left
scratching their head until Section 5.1 makes it clear that an ARC Set
is created by a single entity.
Section 4.2 - I would suggest "An `ARC Set` is a single collection of
three ARC Headers (AAR, AMS, and AS) /from a single ARC Sealer/." Same
reasoning as previous.
Section 4.3 - Typo, "AS header fields allow messages handlers" -
"messages" should lose the trailing "s" (or I suppose it could be
modified to "allow a message's handlers" if that's what was intended...)
Section 5.2 Step 1 -- Because of the preceding reference to maximum
number of ARC Sets, rephrase for clarity at the end, "In the following
algorithm, the /highest instance value ("i=") present in the ARC being
processed is referred to as `N.`/"
That's it. Great work -- what a long way this has come since oar-dev
started up in 2014!
--Steve.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
