Also totally willing to tackle this. 

>From my high tech gadget

> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:47, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
>> I remember the two hog mentioned but there could of been a third.
> 
> At this point I can't find any of the drafts other than mine, and a problem 
> statement mostly by Andrew Sullivan.
> 
> In any event, I agree it's worth having the WG take a whack at this, keeping 
> in mind that its history is not encouraging.
> 
> R's,
> John
> 
>> From my high tech gadget
>> 
>>>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:19, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <0e28da8c-09a6-4e64-ad5e-3741efe60...@kitterman.com> you write:
>>>>> Unfortunately, I didn't come up with an idea for how to do this in DNS.  
>>>>> This seems like a legitimate issue
>>>>> for the WG to work through.
>>>> 
>>>> There were two DNS proposals in DBOUND, a more complex one from Casey
>>>> Deccio and a simpler one from me.  Mine would certainly work for 
>>>> identifying
>>>> org domains.
>>> 
>>> I thought that there was a third one from Andrew too, but let's defer 
>>> getting into the discussion until we get this proposal adopted into the WG.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to