On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:54 AM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> My estimation is that this would change very rarely. If I were developing > software for this, I'd probably check at build time and use that unless > there > are some reason to update. Not that people won't try, but I think not > very > real time is sufficient. > Sure, but: (a) You are probably a more reasonable and thoughtful implementer than average; and (b) It only takes one large operator to, through neglect or a desire to ensure up-to-the-minute data, disregard any query rate advice we give and accidentally DoS IANA off the 'net. If IANA doesn't have a highly scalable CDN in front of it, which I doubt, then this is something the IESG would legitimately raise (as they did with WEIRDS) when this goes up for formal review. DBOUND tried to do this inside the DNS, which solves the CDN problem, but it couldn't reach consensus on the preferred approach, and shut down not long ago without producing anything. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
