In article <974c2d00017358cdf3b78037e4276234db2cfdee.ca...@aegee.org> you write: >Hello John, > >On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 11:31 -0500, John Levine wrote: >> … The failure reports are almost >> entirely useless. Of the ones I get, the majority are random Chinese >> spam that happened to forge one of my domains on the From line, the >> rest are from mailing lists where I wouldn't expect DMARC to pass.
>How do you define a useful report and for which purpose do you want to receive >reports? A useful report would be one that was a message that one of my users had actually sent and was smashed in a way I didn't expect. > I mean, when does sending reports to p=none make sense. The feedback reporting doesn't depend on the policy. Please review section 7 of RFC 7489. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
