In article <c588c5eeec224162bffd080693c70...@bayviewphysicians.com> you write:
> The problem:
>       Spammers use non-existent domains to achieve identity spoofing, such as 
>tax.example.gov.uk 
> This is primarily a reception problem, because many recipient mail filters 
>are not equipped to block this type of fraud. ..

Right, and we can stop right there.

A decent spam filter will treat a nonexistent From: domain or envelope
bounce address as extremely suspicious and send the message into spam
folder purgatory.  If someone's filters aren't doing that, it is
unlikely that they're paying much if any attention to DMARC, and no
amount of fiddling with DMARC will make any difference.

My mail server rejects anything with a non-existent bounce address at
SMTP time and I don't think it's ever rejected anything my users would
want.

The solution to this problem is for mail systems to fix their filters,
not to invent yet another mail-breaking hack that they won't use
anyway.

R's,
John


_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to