In article <54fb29a0-517a-430e-af5b-cb079cc3d...@aegee.org> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hello Douglas, > >1) Check the Authentication-Results header. An implementation could put there >additional information as comment. A >downstream MTA will reevaluate the DKIM-Signature anyway, if it does nkt trust >the previous hop. Common case: aliases >to random servers.
That would be my suggestion. You can put whatever you want into comments in the A-R header. -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
