In article <7cd366d2-ab8d-cce8-67ff-59b79183c...@tomki.com> you write: >As mentioned by Elizabeth recently: (Elizabeth please chime in if this >doesn't capture your meaning) > >the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in >the DMARC RUA created by a receiver. The proposed resolution to this is >that if the receiver does not provide the complete set of DKIM >signatures found, they should provide (in order of preference) >1. a signature which passed DKIM in strict alignment with the From: >header domain >2. a signature which passed DKIM in relaxed alignment with the From: >header domain >3. some other signature that passed DKIM >4. some other signature that didn't pass DKIM
This seeems overcomplex. How about saying the reports SHOULD include all valid DKIM reports. If they can't, they can't, and I don't see any benefit in offering advice on how not to comply. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
