On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:30 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:42 PM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> > wrote: > >> >> If we want to take another run at this and put it in more standard DNS >> terminology, then maybe: >> >> .... a domain for which there is an NXDOMAIN or NODATA response for A, >> AAAA, >> and MX records. >> >> I think that cures John's concern with my last proposal and addresses >> yours as >> well (the response to a CNAME/DNAME is not NODATA/NXDOMAIN, so they are >> correctly followed). >> > > Yes - I think that will fix my concerns (and John's too). > Thinking about this from a reporting POV, where would a receiver categorize messages which ended up with SERVFAIL during the process of DMARC (regular or PSD)? Would "sp" handling or "np" handling be invoked for SERVFAIL (such as a broken DNSSEC implementation)? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
