On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 1:07:05 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, July 13, 2019 3:34:51 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Friday, July 12, 2019 2:28:39 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman > > > > <skl...@kitterman.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote: > > > > > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only > > > > > > NXDOMAINs > > > > > > > > > > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this. > > > > > > > > > > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the > > > > > other > > > > > issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of the > > > > > relevant > > > > > text > > > > > from earlier revisions. > > > > > > > > > > I think we should include this. > > > > > > > > I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used > > > > in > > > > a > > > > PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" > > > > change > > > > to > > > > the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC > > > > record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records. > > > > > > I agree. My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for any > > > DMARC record. Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful beyond > > > PSD. > > > > Attached is my proposed text to add the np tag. Based on the discussion > > to > > date, I assume I'll be asked to add something like this after last call is > > complete, so please let me know how to make it better. > > > > Scott K > > Updated rfcdiff attached. The only change other than typos is to add > mention of 'np' to Appendix A.
Updated again. I believe this addresses all the 'np' related last call discussion. Shortly I'll move on to what I think the group wanted on the other topics. Scott K Note: I'm not planning on publishing diffs on every topic. I only did it for 'np' because it required me to write more new text that no one else had reviewed.
draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-05-from-4.diff.html
Description: application/xhtml
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
