In article <cabugu1rhecafhshcrwrehpru2kjpctoeqwai1g_njbb5ajf...@mail.gmail.com> you write: > Since information about existing implementations gets removed as a doc >passes through the editor's hands, I'm not sure why it would matter to >update a section that will be removed.
Only if we ask them to. I don't see anything in the draft asking them to take that section out. I'd prefer to leave them in, since hints about where to find working code are always helpful even if out of date. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
