I would agree with John here on keeping the implementation section should be kept.
tim (with no hats) On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 3:43 PM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > In article < > cabugu1rhecafhshcrwrehpru2kjpctoeqwai1g_njbb5ajf...@mail.gmail.com> you > write: > > Since information about existing implementations gets removed as a doc > >passes through the editor's hands, I'm not sure why it would matter to > >update a section that will be removed. > > Only if we ask them to. I don't see anything in the draft asking them to > take > that section out. I'd prefer to leave them in, since hints about where to > find > working code are always helpful even if out of date. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
