In article <a56ed61ad07200aff05ad16102525...@junc.eu> you write: >> I suggested they make a few changes which they have now done: there is >> now an explicit _dmarc.dmarc.ietf.org TXT record, and there is an MX >> record pointing at the mail server rather than A/AAAA records. > >spamassassin still says dkim invalid here
Yes, that is correct. I would suggest learning more about DMARC and why that is not a problem. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
