On 6/7/20 6:16 AM, Douglas E. Foster wrote: > 2) Some of the discussion appeared to resolve around the assertion > that DMARC can have no value. Since that view is not universal, I > think the project can continue with those who do believe that it adds > value. > That's not how it works; this working group is discussing an IETF standards-track specification. This is based on the rough consensus of the entire working group; you can't just go forward with a subset of people who agree.
-Jim (with apologies to the WG chairs if I'm venturing into their territory) _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
