On 7/13/2020 12:29 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I'd support making that a WG I-D.
I am having trouble with it, so ~1
IMHO, it could be standard track and modify RFC 5322 if accepted.
It will modify all specs related to DKIM where there is an Author
(5322.From) design requirement.
I don't see how a new "5322.Author" header changes anything especially
if NOT defined with the following characteristics:
- MUST NOT be modified
- MUST be hash to signature.
Dave, indicated it is expected to be hashed bound to the signature.
That makes a SHOULD but not a MUST.
I don't see how we can trust a DKIM-signature that has no immutable
identity requirement to it.
--
Hector Santos,
https://secure.santronics.com
https://twitter.com/hectorsantos
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
