In article <543E391F-800B-4DAD-9310-B6D121AD0FEA@lem.click> you write: >> Why is adoption low? Is that a big problem? Why so few aggressive >> policies? Is that a big problem? > >DMARC can be quite useful even with p=none. This use case provides >insight on what's going on and sometimes, that's all that is wanted. >Moving to more aggressive policies require a degree of control on the >mail flows that not all organizations are prepared to exercise, IMO.
Quite right. My system publishes DMARC policies for over 100 domains, and they're all p=none execpt that four which don't send mail at all have p=reject. I collect and look at the reports which can be very interesting. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
