Hi Alessandro, On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 26/Oct/2020 22:58:50 +0100 Tim Wicinski wrote: > > Please review this draft, and we are looking for *objections to adoption*, > > and > > send comments to the list stating your objections. The working group can > > pick > > over the document after adoption. > > > > Also, the Chairs have announced that the document will be split into > > multiple > > pieces. The details around this split will be sent out shortly in a > > separate email. > > > I don't think there is going to be much use of the document after the split.
The idea is that we are starting from adopting a known document in a known state, which will take less time than discussing 3 adoption calls of documents that are nowhere ready for the WG to review. > Perhaps, it's more efficient to split the document first, so as to let the WG > review documents which are more or less in their final shape. Adopting and > discussing a document that is not going to be published as RFC seems rather > tortuous. IMHO, adopting 3 documents will take much longer and we can start spinning wheels discussing whether certain changes represent WG consensus, etc. > I'm not objecting, I'm just confused. Best Regards, Alexey _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
