On Mon 02/Nov/2020 21:17:44 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article <15f9054f-f32c-4be7-a812-79d7754c5...@www.fastmail.com> you write:
The idea is that we are starting from adopting a known document in a known
state, which will take less time than
discussing 3 adoption calls of documents that are nowhere ready for the WG to
review.
Sounds good to me. I think we already have a fairly good idea of how
it will be split up and the details are part of the WG editing
process.
Oh, well, if adopting draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis is a shortcut for adopting
each of the three drafts that are going to follow it, I endorse the adoption.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
