I think that text is way too long and overspecific but we've already spent
too much time on this so I'll stop and see if there are other opinions.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
OLD
"Failure reports," or "failed message reports," provide diagnostic
information about messages that a Mail Receiver has determined do not
pass the DMARC mechanism. These reports are generally sent at the
time such messages are received and evaluated, to provide the Domain
Owner with timely notification that such failures are occurring, and
to provide information that may assist in diagnosing the cause of the
failures.
NEW
Failure reports provide detailed information about the failure of a single
message or a group of similar messages failing for the same reason. They
are meant to aid extreme cases where a domain owner is unable to detect > why
failures reported in aggregate form did occur. As an extension of other
kinds of failure notifications, these reports can contain either the > content
of a failed message or just its header. The latter characteristic entails
severe privacy concerns. For that reason, and because it turned out not > to
be important, failure reporting is usually disabled.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
