On 2/21/21 08:49, Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA) wrote: > I think it's getting better, but I wouldn't call them Internet Naming > Authorities. Should we just call them higher-level entities?
There are proper names for these actors - there's no need to be even more vague ... > Also, while the biggest help that PSD DMARC would make is for non-existent > organizational domains, it can also help with other domains that haven't > expressed a DMARC policy, so the abstract shouldn't only discuss unregistered > domains. Except for the few cases where the registrar for a given TLD mandates DMARC participation and/or certain policies, there should be no language that sounds like /imposing/ DMARC on domains where the domain owner/operator has not elected to do so. Loose language here will not be received well. --S. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
