It appears that Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >This is going to cause difficulties in deployment for a lot of companies and >domains. Experience tells us that p=quarantine pct=0 detects forwarders >and other types systems that modify and break DMARC authentication. These >systems are undetectable when p=none is in place.
I can see how that would be useful to help debug your mailing list software but it's not so clear how you use it as a sender. Is the idea that you see a bunch of fails in the report that look like lists, then turn on pct=0 and see if they go away? I suppose we could leave pct=0 as a hint to forwarders to turn on their DMARC evasion hacks. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
