It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: >Should we modify the definition of non-existent domains so that a domain that >only has an RFC 7505 null mx record is still considered non-existent?
How about if it has a null MX and a DMARC record or DKIM keys? Remember that those records are at different names than the MX. This sounds like local policy again. Personally, I am not crazy about getting mail that I can't reply to, but my mailbox is full of mail from my bank and stores from which I have ordered telling me that I can't reply to their messages. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
