On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 3:27 AM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have trouble with this statement in section 5.7.1:
>
> "Multi-valued RFC5322.From header fields with multiple domains MUST be
> exempt from DMARC checking."
>
> This language will serve as an invite for spammers to create multiple-from
> messages to ensure that they will evade DMARC.
>

As Todd points out, the best an attacker can hope for in this situation is
to earn a DMARC "none".  It can't get them a "pass".

I can see "exempt" as indicating to some readers a bypass of some kind,
however.  Underscoring the distinction between "none" and "pass" might be
useful.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to