Why should the protocol provide a carve-out for non-participating domains? Similarly, if the carve-out is really important, what are we to do about PSD policies, since they take away the carve-out.? I suppose we could create a clause for PSD policies to say sp="NoCheck", but we have not yet done so, and I don't think that we should.
Doug On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:50 AM Todd Herr <todd.herr= 40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:38 AM Douglas Foster < > dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "Demolish" should have been limited to the notion that a domain owner has >> a "right" to not be DMARC-evaluated, because he has not published a >> policy. With tree walk, every message will have either a domain-published >> policy or a PSD policy. >> >> A message asking for entrance to my network has NO rights. The only >> reason to omit DMARC evaluation of a message is because it is not in the >> interest of the evaluator to do so. That situation has not been >> demonstrated. The RFCs cannot expect evaluators to act contrary to their >> interest to comply with a document. >> > > I'm not asserting that a message has any rights to enter your network. I'm > a firm believer in the concept of "your network, your rules". > > If you have a rule that you will apply the DMARC mechanism regardless of > whether or not a DMARC policy exists for a domain, then you are seemingly > implementing a policy of "no auth, no entry" (and you are well within your > rights to do so) but you are not following the DMARC protocol when doing so. > -- > > *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem > *e:* todd.h...@valimail.com > *m:* 703.220.4153 > > This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or > proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) > authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized > recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or > distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited > and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to > this email and then delete it from your system. > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
