When a topic is decided with consensus, it does not get reopened. What happened here?
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022, 9:35 PM John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > >> I hope you agree that .com is a domain. The spec says that in order to > >> discover the Organizational Domain for a domain, I can perform the DNS > Tree > >> Walk as needed for any of the domains in question. That way, the > domain in > >> question, .com, is the Organizational Domain of itself. That is wrong > >> because .com is a PSD. > >> > >> Oh, perhaps "in question" refers to the three cases mentioned in the > >> Section's intro? It doesn't say so, it says a tree walk "might start" > >> there, without excluding other possibilities. "In question" can > >> legitimately be understood to refer to any domain at hand. > >> > >> Furthermore, the parenthesized reinforcement "if present and > authenticated" > >> in a domain in the first shortcut casts a shadow on the requirement > that all > >> identifiers except From: must be authenticated —if that requirement > were > >> clear, there'd be no need to reinforce it. This corroborates the wrong > >> interpretation. > > > > First, if .com had a DMARC record and .com sent mail, it could be both a > PSD > > for lower level domains and it's own organizational domain for itself, > so > > your conclusion is incorrect. We have discussed this multiple times. I > > think we most recently used .gov.uk as a more realistic example. I > think we > > have been through this more than once and we should not do it again. > > > > Second, your "Furthermore..." claim reads to me as because the text says > the > > identifier must be present and authenticated, it will make readers > likely to > > think that the opposite is true. I think you should take a step back > and > > reconsider your suggestion as it doesn't seem at all logical to me. > > Scott is correct and I wish people would stop trying to reargue decisions > we > already made. > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
