Dear Authors and DMARC group,
In my continuing review of errata posted against RFC 7489, my view is
that the following erratum should be verified, and I intend to do so in
the next month unless given good cause not to do so. The example simply
doesn't follow the ABNF, and the correction does.
Eliot
*
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT*
Reported By: Gary Palmer
Date Reported: 2018-05-22
Section 7.2.1.1 says:
mail.receiver.example!example.com!1013662812!1013749130.gz
It should say:
mail.receiver.example!example.com!1013662812!1013749130.xml.gz
Notes:
The specification states that the suffix should be "xml" for an
uncompressed file, and "xml.gz" for a compressed file. The example
filename is missing the "xml" component of the suffix
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
