Dear Authors and DMARC group,
In my continuing review of errata posted against RFC 7489, my view is
that the following erratum should be rejected, and I intend to do so in
the next month unless given good cause not to do so. My reading is that
the reporter has quoted from the wrong section of RFC 5321, and that we
are not discussion Message Submission Servers.
Eliot (ISE)
*Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT*
Reported By: Borislav Petrov
Date Reported: 2018-11-09
Section 10.3. says:
Everything about it..
Notes:
DMARC relies on inspecting header information. This section suggestion
is not allowed by rfc5321 and contradicts it:
...a relay SMTP has no need to inspect or
act upon the header section or body of the message data and MUST NOT
do so except to add its own "Received:" header field..
So the correct behaviour shoud be only the second option - 2xy and
decide what to do after that being silent or not.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
