Thanks, we can always use more proofreading. I'll put those in the next pull request.
It appears that Neil Anuskiewicz <n...@marmot-tech.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > > I'm not sure if minor things like misspellings, grammar, and other minutia >are useful. I figured I'd try to contribute in a small way. If these kinds >of suggestions are useful, let me know, and I can do more in the future and >maybe dive into slightly more. > >1. Introduction says: > >Abusive email often includes unauthorized and deceptive use of a domain >name in the "From" *heaader* field defined in [RFC5322] and *refered* to as >RFC5322.From. > >It should say: > >Abusive email often includes unauthorized and deceptive use of a domain >name in the "From" *header* field defined in [RFC5322] and *referred* to as >RFC5322.From. > >6. DMARC Feedback > >When Domain Owners can see what effect their policies and practices are >having, they are *better* willing and able to use quarantine and reject >policies. > >It should say: > >When Domain Owners can see what effect their policies and practices are >having, they are *more* willing and able to use quarantine and reject >policies. > >7. Changes from RFC 7489 says: > >This section will summarize *thos* changes. > >It should say: > >This section will summarize *those* changes. > >Thanks. > >Neil > >-=-=-=-=-=- >[Alternative: text/html] >-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
