Hi, Can I get a bit more clarity on what should happen with this one.
Eliot On 21.08.22 17:06, John Levine wrote:
I happen to have a folder with 300,000 reports and took a look. Reporters can be pretty random about what they do. Comcast and Yahoo put angle brackets around the report ID but Google and Microsoft don't and nobody else does as far as I can see, so I would change the last line of the ABNF to: 1*FWS dot-atom-text ; from RFC 5322 or I suppose we could make them optional 1*FWS [%x3c] dot-atom-text [%x3e] ; from RFC 5322 It appears that Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> said:-=-=-=-=-=- Dear Authors and DMARC group, In my continuing review of errata posted against RFC 7489, my view is that the following erratum should be verified, and I intend to do so in the next month unless given good cause not to do so. My logic is that running code in the wild should trump whatever is in the spec. Could people please go over the ABNF with a fine tooth comb? Eliot * * *Status: Reported Type: Technical Publication Format(s) : TEXT* Reported By: Kaspar Etter Date Reported: 2021-03-15 Section 7.2.1.1. says: dmarc-subject = %x52.65.70.6f.72.74 1*FWS ; "Report" %x44.6f.6d.61.69.6e.3a 1*FWS ; "Domain:" domain-name 1*FWS ; from RFC 6376 %x53.75.62.6d.69.74.74.65.72.3a ; "Submitter:" 1*FWS domain-name 1*FWS %x52.65.70.6f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:" msg-id ; from RFC 5322 It should say: dmarc-subject = %x52.65.70.6f.72.74 1*FWS ; "Report" %x44.6f.6d.61.69.6e.3a 1*FWS ; "Domain:" domain-name 1*FWS ; from RFC 6376 %x53.75.62.6d.69.74.74.65.72.3a ; "Submitter:" 1*FWS domain-name 1*FWS %x52.65.70.6f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:" 1*FWS %x3c dot-atom-text %x3e ; from RFC 5322 Notes: According to RFC 5322, msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]. The example given in Section 7.2.1.1. (<2002.02.15.1>) does not adhere to this and neither do reports in the wild. Instead of referring to the msg-id ABNF, I suggest that we refer to the dot-atom-text ABNF and include "<" and ">" as ASCII characters. This also has the advantage of getting rid of CFWS. According to RFC 5322, "comments may be included in structured field bodies" but "Subject" is not a structured header field. -=-=-=-=-=- [Alternative: text/html] -=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
