On Sat 08/Apr/2023 15:59:30 +0200 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Eric D. Williams <e...@infobro.com> said:
-=-=-=-=-=-
I think the reliance upon list operators is properly placed on that role.
It's not a DMARC problem, it's a DKIM problem, I think.
No, it's a DMARC problem. DKIM didn't cause any problems for mailing
lists (ignoring ill-advised and never used ADSP) until DMARC was
layered on top of it, and AOL and Yahoo abused it to foist the support
costs on the rest of the world after they let crooks steal their
users' address books.
That's how it happened. Can we now accept their push? After so many email
addresses became public, how about accepting that email addresses being public
doesn't have to imply that anyone can impersonate them? Their move forced
DMARC into a role that it wasn't design to play, but perhaps it's not so bad
after all...?
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
